Miley cyrus chat bot
Reece Leonard (talk) , 7 September 2015 (UTC) It's more of a common sense issue than anything else.It's messy and inconsistent to have a plethora of genres listed on an album's page, especially if the genres have only been named by a single music critic/journalist.Reece Leonard (talk) , 5 September 2015 (UTC) Further point: this section is also completely unorganized.It's a gigantic mass of text, and the reviews haven't been sorted by their relative positivity or negativity (although this brings us back to the issue I've raised above, as there are barely any mixed/negative reviews listed and it would be extremely difficult to organize this section in its current iteration).But in regards to your question, it is a studio album that Miley independently released.
), but so far these edits have been unsourced and poorly worded.Mrmoustache14 (talk) , 6 September 2015 (UTC)Art pop and experimental may be similar in some cases, but are they the same? Psychedelic rock, psychedelic pop, and space rock are not psychedelic subgenres as "psychedelic" isn't even a genre. The number of genres listed for this album is completely ridiculous, and a majority of them don't actually fit album at all (art pop being the most egregious offender).I'd also like to point out that it doesn't matter whether or not a genre is sourced unless the album has been referred to as fitting into that genre several times.Art pop and experimental for instance mean very similar things therefore there's no point in listing both.Same goes from psychedelic rock, psychedelic pop, and space rock.