Harrington method pipestem dating Jasmn couple sex cam
This serendipitous find opened a door to the fascinating world of the archaeological study of English colonial clay pipes, particularly stem fragments.Lance’s Tizer ring pull is analogous, in a very small way, to clay pipe stem fragments.The graph can be read as follows: in the 1650 – 1680 time range (second from the bottom), Harrington found that 57% of the holes were 7/64ths of an inch wide, another 25% were 8/64ths of an inch wide, and the remaining 18% were 6/64ths of an inch wide. Were the average bore hole size of a cluster of fragments from an undated site to fall somewhere within these sizes, it was a good bet the site was probably from the 1650 – 1680 time period. For a couple of reasons, the Detectorists came to mind this past summer while I was on vacation at the North Fork of Long Island, New York. That exchange captures the gently mocking, almost self-deprecating humor of this superb series.
The 3.3 mm hole diameter shown in the picture above is slightly less than 0.13 inches.
Were archaeologists on a dig in that same Essex field as depicted in the Detectorists some 200 years hence to come upon several examples of that same ring pull, they might well date the layer of their excavation which give them up to 1983, give or take.
So it is with pipe stem fragments; they have become one important means of dating archaeological sites of colonial America.
And of course their range is much broader than the decade, or decade and a half, during which pop tops were torn from soda cans and discarded like so many cigarette butts. I wasn’t picking up cigarette butts, I was bird watching.
Though pipe bowls are also used in the dating process, pipe stem fragments are apparently go-to artifacts partly because these pieces are often found in staggering numbers (stem fragments were so plentiful in colonial times they were sometimes used as ballast in ships; one path in Williamsburg was “paved” with some 12,000 stem fragments) and complete bowls are relatively rare.